![]() These are my impressions thus far though.Ĭlick to expand.I think you might have confused those, Eric. The Sony Oxford plugins to me, sound like pretty much any other plugins out there.īut of course I will review them again in a year or so to see if I've changed my mind about any of them. Maybe I'm a bit harsh because I was expecting something extraordinary judging from all the reviews and just felt really let down when they didn't stand up to my expectations. To be honest, I can't understand what the rave was all about with these plugins. ![]() A good combination would be the Ozone Limiter, Oxford Limiters Enhance, and then use the AutoComp to protect against reconstruction overs and then the Ozone Megabitmax dither. the Enhance section will do a MUCH better job than the Inflator IMO. Again the Ozone actually sounds better, BUT the Enhance section is really really good! If you need the extra level. Well, the limiter section doesn't sound that good to me. ![]() Also, iZotope Ozone sounds quite a bit cleaner at the same \"loudness\" as Inflator. If you want loudness, I think it still sounds way better to clip the front end of a good A/D. No biggie here either, I find the PSP Neon to sound a bit better (not linear-phase) and after that I'd say Cambridge sounds better than Oxford EQ. The \"Warmth\" section also doesn't sound quite there, I think the Warmth option in Waves RComp sound more musical in comparison if that's what you need. I actually think that the VST Dynamics that come with Nuendo sound better for some stuff than the Oxford Dynamics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |